There are only two reasons people voluntarily leave their jobs

While there are many reasons employees voluntarily leave their positions — and companies are looking at those reasons plus other life events to try and prevent people from leaving — I think there are simply two broad reasons why people move on.

Those two reasons are: The level of threat against the person and the level of bullshit the person believes they are putting up with.

It’s a useful view from a Cubicle Warrior’s perspective to consistently evaluate as time goes on in a position.

What’s your job threat level?

Job threats are those things that an employee believes could threaten their job itself or their personal well being. The manager, of course, is the top of the list here because your manager is your most important customer and the biggest threat to your career.

Given the level of reorganization in most large companies — what I all the 5% unemployment rate and 75% churn rate from reorganizations — it’s not hard to have new managers quite often taking over (reorganized) teams. Personally, in over 40(!) years in the workforce, I’ve never had my annual review given to me by the same manager two years in a row, save one manager. And more than a handful of times, not even the same manager for six month reviews.

No wonder manager compatibility with teams is such a big deal.

But it’s not just managers. Threats come from a variety of sources:

• Company mergers and buyouts. My two layoffs and two other job changes happened because of a merger/buyout. Maybe it’s just me because I operate at the edge of change in a company, but mergers and buyouts are high threat to positions.
• Poor financial performance significantly increases the level of churn and possible layoffs.
• Executive level turnover. This is especially true at the “C” level — CEO, COO, CIO, etc. This is because new executives come in with an agenda the hiring executive or board believes is missing. For example, a new CIO came into one of my companies which had never done outsourcing and the CIO had outsourced positions at her previous companies (see: Google an incoming executive). Well, of course outsourcing was going to happen. That threatens jobs. And jobs were lost.
• More sneaky, but very true — a transformative change in your marketplace. Think of the Apple iPhone and Android phones and the impact on Nokia (bought by Microsoft and then basically abandoned) and Blackberry (crash and burn). It’s hard for cubicle dwellers to know how big of an impact these changes are in the marketplace, but if all of a sudden your company goes on the defensive about their products, you’re experiencing an impact.

The job threat level, of course, is driven by fear. Fear of losing your job. It’s very powerful.

What’s your level of bullshit to tolerate?

If job threats are more top down, bullshit is more about passing some line that is different for every person. Every position has it’s level of bullshit; it is a question of how much is tolerable and how much is too much.

The bullshit is really about company culture and the rules of the road:

• Is your culture about results or maintaining control?
• Does your company deal with change well?
• Do people cooperate with you and your needs?
• Do people agree with where you are going and then change their mind?
• Do people make decisions — and then revoke them?
• Does the effort to get something done — which was okay when you started — now seem like an insurmountable hurdle?

Yeah, that stuff. How much of it can you handle? At what point does it cross the line?

Combine threat and bullshit and you have a reason to leave

These are not either or — they are both. You can be having a high level of bullshit, but not feeling any threat to your position and can handle that for a while.

You can have a higher threat level (perhaps a new manager), but a very easy-to-handle level of bullshit and you’ll be okay.

But if you are dealing with a high level of perceived bullshit in your position and then you are presented with a higher level of threat to your position…things will break.

There is always a trigger

As the Harvard Business Review article notes above, there are life changing events that happen that will trigger the action to start looking for a job (“Job hunting jumps 12% just before birthdays”). Those life events can force the examination of threats and bullshit and come to the conclusion it is time to leave.

Or maybe you’re working on something significant and you work and work to get to a conclusion and then you are undermined by someone. Or you get a new manager and things don’t go so well as your styles are different.

There are hundreds of possible events, but the point is this: once there is a trigger that flips you from staying to “it’s time to leave,” not much will change that position. In fact, most everything that happens at work going forward will most likely reinforce the position that it is time to leave.

It’s almost always something emotional that triggers the tip point — someone undermining you, a manager that does something to minimize your work, a performance rating that was not what you expected — and sets off the quest to find a new job.

I’m not saying any of this is wrong, incorrect, or needs changing. But understanding threat and bullshit is an important way to look at how things are going on the job.

If you sign up for my newsletter, my bonus item is a little survey that you take every quarter so you can track the level of threat and bullshit.

Every job ends. It’s best to figure out what triggers it and how long it will be before you need to find another gig.

Related posts:

The most important factor in deciding to stay or leave a job To Stay or Leave — Your Industry To Stay or Leave — Part Two Persistent Layoffs Equals Time to Leave